Qwen3.7-Max Benchmark: Agentic Coding, Reasoning, and Long-Horizon Scores

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kimi K2.6 vs Claude: Especially Claude Opus 4.7

Before comparing Kimi K2.6 with Claude — especially Claude Opus 4.7 — it helps to realize there are really two questions bundled together. First: what does Moonshot's K2.6 benchmark table say on the comparisons it actually makes? Second: what does Anthropic say about Opus 4.7, which is newer than the Claude model in Moonshot's table? The distinction matters. As of April 21, 2026, Moonshot's K2.6 table compares against Claude Opus 4.6, while Anthropic's newest flagship page is already for Claude Opus 4.7. So if anyone claims they have a fully clean K2.6 vs Opus 4.7 apples-to-apples table, slow down — I didn't find one in the primary sources for this post. New to Kimi K2.6? Try Kimi K2.6 for free . Short Answer Kimi K2.6 is the right call if you want much lower published API pricing than Opus 4.7, want the model Moonshot explicitly positions for long-horizon coding and agent workflows, care about price/performance for coding-heavy and tool-heavy work, or want str...
Read more

How to Use Kimi K2.6 in OpenClaw

If you want to run Kimi K2.6 inside OpenClaw, the question that actually matters isn't "is it possible?" — it's "which part is already documented, and which part depends on your local install catching up?" As of April 21, 2026, here's where each side stands. OpenClaw's Moonshot provider docs clearly document the Moonshot AI (Kimi) provider flow, but those docs still show moonshot/kimi-k2.5 as the built-in default. Moonshot's own K2.6 docs confirm K2.6 is already available on the same Moonshot Open Platform API, and the K2.6 tech blog explicitly calls out strong performance in OpenClaw-style proactive agent workflows. So the practical read is simple: K2.6 lives on the same Moonshot provider path, but your specific OpenClaw install may still need a catalog refresh or an upgrade before the model shows up out of the box. New to Kimi K2.6? Try Kimi K2.6 for free . Short Answer Go with Kimi K2.6 in OpenClaw if you want stronger long-horizon codi...
Read more

Kimi K2.6 Pricing: API Rates vs Kimi K2.5

If you want the Kimi K2.6 price, the only source worth quoting is Moonshot's own pricing page. Everything else is secondhand. As of April 21, 2026, Moonshot's K2.6 pricing page reads: Input Price (Cache Hit) : $0.16 / 1M tokens Input Price (Cache Miss) : $0.95 / 1M tokens Output Price : $4.00 / 1M tokens Context Window : 262,144 tokens And for comparison, K2.5 on the matching pricing page: Input Price (Cache Hit) : $0.10 / 1M tokens Input Price (Cache Miss) : $0.60 / 1M tokens Output Price : $3.00 / 1M tokens Context Window : 262,144 tokens So the real question isn't "is K2.6 cheap?" It's three separate ones: how much more expensive it is than K2.5, whether that premium is worth it for your workload, and what changes once caching is in the picture. New to Kimi K2.6? Try Kimi K2.6 for free . Kimi K2.6 Pricing at a Glance Model Cache Hit Input Cache Miss Input Output Context Kimi K2.5 $0.10 $0.60 $3.00 262,144 Kimi K2.6 $0.16 $0.95 $4.00 262,144 How Muc...
Read more